|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Trends in Amplification, Vol. 10, No. 2,
83-93 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1084713806289553
The Effects of Digital Noise Reduction on the Acceptance of Background Noise
H. Gustav Mueller, PhD
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37232-8242;GoVandy{at}GusMueller.net
Jennifer Weber, AuD
Department of Communication Disorders, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Colorado
Benjamin W.Y. Hornsby, PhD
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
Modern hearing aids commonly employ digital noise reduction (DNR) algorithms. The potential benefit of these algorithms is to provide improved speech understanding in noise or, at the least, to provide relaxed listening or increased ease of listening. In this study, 22 adults were fitted with 16-channel wide-dynamic-range compression hearing aids containing DNR processing. The DNR includes both modulation-based and Wiener-filter-type algorithms working simultaneously. Both speech intelligibility and acceptable noise level (ANL) were assessed using the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) with DNR on and DNR off. The ANL was also assessed without hearing aids. The results showed a significant mean improvement for the ANL (4.2 dB) for the DNR-on condition when compared to DNR-off condition. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the magnitude of ANL improvement (relative to DNR on) and the DNR-off ANL. There was no significant mean improvement for the HINT for the DNR on condition, and on an individual basis, the HINT score did not significantly correlate with either aided ANL (DNR on or DNR off). These findings suggest that at least within the constraints of the DNR algorithms and test conditions employed in this study, DNR can significantly improve the clinically measured ANL, which may result in improved ease of listening for speech-in-noise situations.
Key Words: hearing aids digital noise reduction (DNR) background noise acceptable noise level (ANL)
References
- Kirkwood DH. Dispensers surveyed on what leads to patient satisfaction. Hear J. 2005;58:19-29.
- Mueller HG, Ricketts TA. Digital noise reduction. Hear J. 2005;58:10-17.
- Bentler RA. Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005; 16:473-484.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bentler RA, Chiou, L-K. Digital noise reduction: an overview. Trends Amplif. 2006;10:67-82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Anzalone M, Doherty K, Carney L. Potential benefits to intelligibility of time-frequency gain manipulation. Poster presented at: the American Auditory Society Annual Meeting; March 5-7, 2005; Scottsdale, Ariz.
- Boymans M, Dreschler WA. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality. Audiology. 2000;39:260-268.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Walden B, Surr R, Cord M, Edwards B, Olson L. Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11:540-560.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Alcantara JI, Moore BC, Kuhnel V, Launer S. Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid. Int J Audiol. 2003;42:34-42.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ricketts T, Hornsby B. Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing digital noise reduction. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16:270-277.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Cox R, Alexander G. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1995;16:176-186.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Nabelek AK, Tuckler FM, Letowski TR. Toleration of background noises: relationships with patterns of hearing aid user by elderly persons. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34:679-685.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Nabelek AK. Acceptance of background noise may be key to successful fittings. Hear J. 2005;58:10-15.
- Freyaldenhoven MC, Nabelek AK, Burchfield SB, Thelin JW. Acceptable noise level as a measure of directional hearing aid benefit. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005; 16:228-236.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Nabelek AK, Tampas JW, Burchfield SB. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions. J Speech Hear Res. 2004;47:1001-1011.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Rogers DS, Harkrider AW, Burchfield S, Nabelek A. The influence of listener's gender on the acceptance of background noise. J Am Acad Audiol. 2003;14:372-382.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Nabelek AK, Freyaldenhoven M, Tampas J, Burchfield S, Muenchen R. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use. J Am Acad Audiol. In press.
- Powers TA, Holube I, Wesselkamp M. The use of digital features to combat background noise. In: Kochkin S, Strom KE, eds. High performance hearing solutions. Hear Rev. 1999;3:36-39.
- Vaseghi SV. Advanced Signal Processing and Noise Reduction. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley; 2000.
- Dillon H. NAL-NL-1: a new prescriptive fitting procedure for nonlinear hearing aids. Hear J. 1999;52:10-16.
- Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan J. Development of a hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception threshold in quiet and noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;95:1085-1099.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Harkrider AW, Smith SB. Acceptable noise level, phoneme recognition in noise, and measures of auditory efferent activity. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16:530-545.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Neuman
From the Editor
Trends in Amplification,
March 1, 2007;
11(1):
5 - 6.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Bentler and L.-K. Chiou
Digital noise reduction: an overview.
Trends in Amplification,
June 1, 2006;
10(2):
67 - 82.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. V. Palmer, R. Bentler, and H. G. Mueller
Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds.
Trends in Amplification,
June 1, 2006;
10(2):
95 - 104.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|