Trends in Amplification

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kates, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kates, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Trends in Amplification, Vol. 9, No. 2, 45-76 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/108471380500900202

Principles of Digital Dynamic-Range Compression

James M. Kates

GN ReSound, c/o University of Colorado, Department Speech Lang. Hearing Sciences, 409 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309; jkates{at}gnresound.dk

This article provides an overview of dynamic-range compression in digital hearing aids. Digital technology is becoming increasingly common in hearing aids, particularly because of the processing flexibility it offers and the opportunity to create more-effective devices. The focus of the paper is on the algorithms used to build digital compression systems. Of the various approaches that can be used to design a digital hearing aid, this paper considers broadband compression, multi-channel filter banks, a frequency-domain compressor using the FFT, the side-branch design that separates the filtering operation from the frequency analysis, and the frequency-warped version of the side-branch approach that modifies the analysis frequency spacing to more closely match auditory perception. Examples of the compressor frequency resolution, group delay, and compression behavior are provided for the different design approaches.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
T. A. Ricketts, A. B. Dittberner, and E. E. Johnson
High-Frequency Amplification and Sound Quality in Listeners With Normal Through Moderate Hearing Loss
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2008; 51(1): 160 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
A. C. Neuman
From the Editor
Trends in Amplification, March 1, 2007; 11(1): 5 - 6.
[PDF]


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
H. Levitt
A Historical Perspective on Digital Hearing Aids: How Digital Technology Has Changed Modern Hearing Aids
Trends in Amplification, March 1, 2007; 11(1): 7 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
P. E. Souza and K. L. Tremblay
New Perspectives on Assessing Amplification Effects
Trends in Amplification, September 1, 2006; 10(3): 119 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]