This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1084713809346160v1 13/3/190    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nittrouer, S. Articles by Chapman, C. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nittrouer, S. Articles by Chapman, C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effects of Bilateral Electric and Bimodal Electric—Acoustic Stimulation on Language Development

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, susan.nittrouer{at}osumc.edu

Christopher Chapman, BA

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

There is no doubt that cochlear implants have improved the spoken language abilities of children with hearing loss, but delays persist. Consequently, it is imperative that new treatment options be explored. This study evaluated one aspect of treatment that might be modified, that having to do with bilateral implants and bimodal stimulation. A total of 58 children with at least one implant were tested at 42 months of age on four language measures spanning a continuum from basic to generative in nature. When children were grouped by the kind of stimulation they had at 42 months (one implant, bilateral implants, or bimodal stimulation), no differences across groups were observed. This was true even when groups were constrained to only children who had at least 12 months to acclimatize to their stimulation configuration. However, when children were grouped according to whether or not they had spent any time with bimodal stimulation (either consistently since their first implant or as an interlude to receiving a second) advantages were found for children who had some bimodal experience, but those advantages were restricted to language abilities that are generative in nature. Thus, previously reported benefits of simultaneous bilateral implantation early in a child’s life may not extend to generative language. In fact, children may benefit from a period of bimodal stimulation early in childhood because low-frequency speech signals provide prosody and serve as an aid in learning how to perceptually organize the signal that is received through a cochlear implant.

Key Words: hearing loss • children • implants

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Trends in Amplification, Vol. 13, No. 3, 190-205 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1084713809346160


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?