This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1084713808325306v1 12/4/283    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. Articles by Best, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. Articles by Best, V. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Selective Attention in Normal and Impaired Hearing

Hearing Research Center, Departments of Cognitive and Neural Systems and Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology Program, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, shinn{at}cns.bu.edu

Virginia Best, PhD

Discipline of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

A common complaint among listeners with hearing loss (HL) is that they have difficulty communicating in common social settings. This article reviews how normal-hearing listeners cope in such settings, especially how they focus attention on a source of interest. Results of experiments with normal-hearing listeners suggest that the ability to selectively attend depends on the ability to analyze the acoustic scene and to form perceptual auditory objects properly. Unfortunately, sound features important for auditory object formation may not be robustly encoded in the auditory periphery of HL listeners. In turn, impaired auditory object formation may interfere with the ability to filter out competing sound sources. Peripheral degradations are also likely to reduce the salience of higher-order auditory cues such as location, pitch, and timbre, which enable normal-hearing listeners to select a desired sound source out of a sound mixture. Degraded peripheral processing is also likely to increase the time required to form auditory objects and focus selective attention so that listeners with HL lose the ability to switch attention rapidly (a skill that is particularly important when trying to participate in a lively conversation). Finally, peripheral deficits may interfere with strategies that normal-hearing listeners employ in complex acoustic settings, including the use of memory to fill in bits of the conversation that are missed. Thus, peripheral hearing deficits are likely to cause a number of interrelated problems that challenge the ability of HL listeners to communicate in social settings requiring selective attention.

Key Words: attention • segregation • auditory object • auditory scene analysis

This version was published on December 1, 2008

Trends in Amplification, Vol. 12, No. 4, 283-299 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1084713808325306


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Parbery-Clark, E. Skoe, and N. Kraus Musical Experience Limits the Degradative Effects of Background Noise on the Neural Processing of Sound J. Neurosci., November 11, 2009; 29(45): 14100 - 14107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Oxenham Pitch Perception and Auditory Stream Segregation: Implications for Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implants Trends in Amplification, December 1, 2008; 12(4): 316 - 331. [Abstract] [PDF]